## CodeSandbox: A Cloud-Based Development Environment
CodeSandbox is a cloud-based IDE designed to simplify the development process by offering a seamless, online platform. It supports Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems, making it highly accessible for developers working on different platforms. Developed by CodeSandbox, this tool allows for agentic editing with multi-file support and offers full terminal access. One of the standout features of CodeSandbox is its ability to provide predictive edits, enhancing the coding experience. Additionally, it offers a seamless migration path, which is especially beneficial for teams looking to switch to a new development environment without encountering disruptions.
The platform’s cloud architecture means that developers can work collaboratively in real-time, leveraging the web-based interface for easy code sharing and project management. CodeSandbox is also recognized for its standard privacy practices, ensuring user data is handled responsibly. With a free tier available and an affordable pricing model ranging from free to $20 per month, it caters to both individual developers and enterprise users. It’s an ideal choice for those who value cloud accessibility and intuitive collaboration features.
Pros
- ✓ Cloud-based for easy access from any device
- ✓ Supports Windows, macOS, and Linux
- ✓ Multi-file agentic editing capabilities
- ✓ Full terminal access
- ✓ Predictive edits enhance coding efficiency
- ✓ Seamless migration process
Cons
- ✕ Limited to a 64k token context window
- ✕ No local inference capabilities
- ✕ Standard privacy policy may not meet all enterprise needs
## JetBrains Fleet: A Standalone IDE with Powerful Features
JetBrains Fleet is a standalone development tool that runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, and Chromebook, offering flexibility for developers across various platforms. Developed by JetBrains, Fleet is tailored for those who prefer a more robust, locally hosted development environment. Unlike cloud-based IDEs, Fleet supports local inference, providing enhanced performance and speed for intensive coding tasks. It also features agentic editing with multi-file support and full terminal access, similar to CodeSandbox.
Fleet’s standout attribute is its 128k token context window, which allows for more extensive coding projects and in-depth analysis. The tool requires setup for migration, which might be a consideration for teams transitioning from other environments. However, its strong performance capabilities and option for local inference make it a powerful choice for developers looking for a high-performance, standalone IDE. With a free tier and professional pricing, Fleet is accessible to a wide range of users, from hobbyists to professional developers.
Pros
- ✓ Supports Windows, macOS, Linux, and Chromebook
- ✓ Local inference enhances performance
- ✓ Larger 128k token context window
- ✓ Multi-file agentic editing capabilities
- ✓ Full terminal access
Cons
- ✕ Requires setup for migration
- ✕ Standalone architecture may limit collaboration features
- ✕ Standard privacy policy may not meet all enterprise needs
Comparison Table
| Feature | CodeSandbox | JetBrains Fleet |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Type | cloud | standalone |
| Supported Os | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux, Chromebook |
| Developer | CodeSandbox | JetBrains |
| Context Window | 64k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Agentic Editing | Yes, multi-file | Yes, multi-file |
| Terminal Access | Full | Full |
| Privacy Mode | Standard Privacy Policy | Standard Privacy Policy |
| Certifications | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) |
| About Price | Free – $20/mo | Free/Pro |
| Config File | sandbox.config.json | .fleetrc |
| Migration | Seamless | Requires setup |
Conclusion
Both CodeSandbox and JetBrains Fleet offer unique advantages tailored to different development needs. CodeSandbox excels in cloud-based collaboration and ease of use, while JetBrains Fleet provides robust local performance with extensive context analysis. Your choice between them will depend on whether you prioritize cloud accessibility or local power and performance.