CodeSandbox
CodeSandbox is a cloud-based development environment that supports Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems. Developed by CodeSandbox, it offers a comprehensive platform for coding with features like multi-file agentic editing and full terminal access. The platform supports predictive edits, enhancing coding efficiency by suggesting code completions and modifications. Although it does not support local inference or large language models (LLMs), CodeSandbox provides a seamless migration process and standard privacy policy. It also offers a free tier, with pricing extending up to $20 per month for advanced features. Certified with SOC2 Type II for enterprise, it ensures a secure environment for developers.
Pros
- ✓ Cloud-based architecture for ease of access.
- ✓ Supports multi-file agentic editing.
- ✓ Offers a seamless migration process.
- ✓ Predictive edits enhance coding efficiency.
- ✓ SOC2 Type II certified for security.
Cons
- ✕ No support for local inference.
- ✕ Does not support large language models (LLMs).
- ✕ Privacy mode is limited to standard policy.
Void
Void is an open-source, standalone development tool compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux. It supports a wide range of large language models, including Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, and GPT-4, among others. With unlimited context window capabilities via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), Void offers extensive flexibility for developers requiring sophisticated AI model integration. The tool ensures zero data retention, prioritizing user privacy. Like CodeSandbox, Void supports multi-file agentic editing and full terminal access, with the added benefit of local inference. Its free pricing model and SOC2 Type II certification make it an attractive option for developers seeking a robust and secure coding environment.
Pros
- ✓ Supports a wide range of large language models.
- ✓ Offers unlimited context window via RAG.
- ✓ Ensures zero data retention for privacy.
- ✓ Supports local inference.
- ✓ Open-source and free to use.
Cons
- ✕ Standalone architecture may lack cloud convenience.
- ✕ Requires user management for updates and maintenance.
Comparison Table
| Feature | CodeSandbox | Void |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Type | cloud | standalone |
| Supported Os | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Developer | CodeSandbox | Void (open-source) |
| Supported Llms | – | Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, Grok 3, o4-mini, Qwen 3, DeepSeek, Llama, Gemma 3 |
| Context Window | 64k tokens | Unlimited (RAG) |
| Agentic Editing | Yes, multi-file | Yes, multi-file |
| Terminal Access | Full | Full |
| Privacy Mode | Standard Privacy Policy | Zero Data Retention (ZDR) |
| Certifications | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) |
| About Price | Free – $20/mo | Free |
| Config File | sandbox.config.json | settings.json |
| Migration | Seamless | Seamless |
Conclusion
<p>Both CodeSandbox and Void offer powerful features for developers, with CodeSandbox excelling in cloud convenience and predictive capabilities, while Void stands out for its support of large language models and privacy features. The choice between the two will depend on the specific needs for cloud accessibility or advanced AI integration and privacy.</p>