createaiagent.net

Comparing Cursor and Melty: A Detailed Analysis

Alex Hrymashevych Author by:
Alex Hrymashevych
Last update:
25 Jan 2026
Reading time:
~ 2 mins

Cursor

Cursor is a standalone application developed by Cursor, offering a versatile platform compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems. It supports a wide range of language models, including GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, among others. The tool features a generous context window of 1 million tokens, though it does not support local inference. Users benefit from agentic editing across multiple files and full terminal access, enhancing productivity and efficiency. Cursor also offers predictive edits to streamline coding processes. The tool is available with a free tier and a premium subscription priced at up to $20 per month. Its SOC2 Type II certification ensures compliance with stringent security standards, making it a reliable choice for enterprises.

Pros

  • Supports a wide range of language models
  • 1 million token context window
  • Full terminal access
  • Predictive edits available
  • SOC2 Type II certified

Cons

  • No local inference support
  • Migration is seamless but could lack personalization

Melty

Melty is a standalone tool developed by Charlie Holtz and Jackson de Campos, compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux. It supports advanced language models, including GPT-5 and Claude 4.5. Melty offers a context window of 200,000 tokens and the ability to perform local inference, which can be a critical feature for users concerned with data privacy and processing speed. Similar to Cursor, it supports agentic editing across multiple files and provides full terminal access. Users can start with a free version or opt for a professional plan under the Free/Pro pricing structure. Although migration requires setup, its SOC2 Type II certification ensures high security standards.

Pros

  • Supports local inference
  • Full terminal access
  • SOC2 Type II certified
  • Free/Pro pricing options

Cons

  • Smaller context window compared to Cursor
  • Migration requires additional setup

Comparison Table

Feature Cursor Melty
Architecture Type standalone standalone
Supported Os Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Developer Cursor Charlie Holtz, Jackson de Campos
Supported Llms GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-5 (High MAX), Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini, cursor-small, Supermaven GPT-5, Claude 4.5, Gemini 3.0, o3
Custom Model cursor-small
Context Window 1M tokens 200k tokens
Agentic Editing Yes, multi-file Yes, multi-file
Terminal Access Full Full
Privacy Mode Standard Privacy Policy Standard Privacy Policy
Certifications SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) SOC2 Type II (Enterprise)
About Price Free – $20/mo Free/Pro
Config File .cursorrules .meltyrc
Migration Seamless Requires setup

Conclusion

Both Cursor and Melty offer unique advantages tailored to different user needs. Cursor excels with its extensive language model support and larger context window, while Melty provides the benefits of local inference and straightforward security compliance. Choosing between them depends on specific requirements such as context window size and local data processing capabilities.