createaiagent.net

Comparing Coding Tools: Cursor vs Trae

Alex Hrymashevych Author by:
Alex Hrymashevych
Last update:
25 Jan 2026
Reading time:
~ 2 mins

Cursor: A Comprehensive Coding Assistant

Cursor is a standalone coding tool developed by Cursor, designed to cater to developers across multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It supports an extensive range of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, and more advanced models such as GPT-5 (High MAX) and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Cursor also offers its own custom model called ‘cursor-small’, providing a unique edge in model customization. With a vast context window of 1 million tokens, Cursor facilitates a robust environment for complex code editing and predictive tasks. The tool offers full terminal access and multi-file agentic editing, making it a powerful ally for developers who require comprehensive coding solutions.

Pros

  • Supports a wide range of LLMs including GPT-5.
  • Custom model 'cursor-small' for specialized tasks.
  • Large context window of 1M tokens.
  • Full terminal access and multi-file editing.
  • Free tier available.

Cons

  • Higher pricing up to $20/mo.
  • No local inference capabilities.

Trae: ByteDance’s Efficient Coding Tool

Developed by ByteDance, Trae is a standalone coding tool that operates seamlessly across Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms. It supports prominent LLMs such as Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o, offering a streamlined approach to coding with a context window of 200k tokens. While Trae lacks a custom model, it compensates with reliable multi-file agentic editing and full terminal access. This tool is particularly suitable for developers seeking a straightforward solution with essential features for efficient coding. Trae is available in a free and pro version, providing flexible pricing options for users.

Pros

  • Developed by ByteDance, ensuring robust performance.
  • Supports popular LLMs like Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
  • Offers both free and pro versions.
  • Full terminal access and multi-file editing.

Cons

  • Smaller context window of 200k tokens.
  • No custom model available.

Comparison Table

Feature Cursor Trae
Architecture Type standalone standalone
Supported Os Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Developer Cursor ByteDance
Supported Llms GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-5 (High MAX), Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini, cursor-small, Supermaven Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o
Custom Model cursor-small
Context Window 1M tokens 200k tokens
Agentic Editing Yes, multi-file Yes, multi-file
Terminal Access Full Full
Privacy Mode Standard Privacy Policy Standard Privacy Policy
Certifications SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) SOC2 Type II (Enterprise)
About Price Free – $20/mo Free/Pro
Config File .cursorrules .traerc
Migration Seamless Seamless

Conclusion

Both Cursor and Trae are powerful coding tools with distinct features. Cursor stands out with its wide range of supported LLMs and large context window, making it ideal for complex projects. On the other hand, Trae offers a straightforward and efficient solution, appealing to those who prioritize simplicity and essential functionalities. Choosing between them depends on the specific needs and preferences of the developer.