createaiagent.net

Comparing Cursor and Void: A Detailed Analysis

Alex Hrymashevych Author by:
Alex Hrymashevych
Last update:
25 Jan 2026
Reading time:
~ 3 mins

Cursor: A Versatile Standalone Tool

Cursor is a versatile standalone tool designed for users across Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms. Developed by Cursor, this tool supports a wide array of large language models including GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-5 (High MAX), Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini, cursor-small, and Supermaven. With a custom model named cursor-small, Cursor offers a substantial context window of 1 million tokens, though it doesn’t support local inference. Users can benefit from agentic editing across multiple files and enjoy full terminal access. Predictive edits are available, enhancing the tool’s usability. Privacy is maintained through a standard privacy policy, and the tool is SOC2 Type II certified for enterprise users. Cursor offers a free tier with pricing up to $20 per month, and configuration is managed via a .cursorrules file. Migration is seamless, ensuring a smooth transition for new users.

Pros

  • Supports a wide range of LLMs including GPT-5 (High MAX).
  • Offers agentic editing across multiple files.
  • Full terminal access available.
  • Predictive edits enhance usability.
  • SOC2 Type II certified for enterprise security.

Cons

  • No local inference capability.
  • Privacy mode is only standard.

Void: Powerful Open-Source Solution

Void is an open-source standalone tool compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux. Developed by the community, it supports diverse LLMs such as Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, Grok 3, o4-mini, Qwen 3, DeepSeek, Llama, and Gemma 3. Unlike Cursor, Void boasts an unlimited context window through its RAG capabilities and supports local inference, which can be crucial for some applications. It offers agentic editing across multiple files and full terminal access. Privacy is prioritized with a zero data retention policy, and the tool has SOC2 Type II certification, ensuring robust security for enterprise users. Void is available for free, with configurations managed through a settings.json file, and ensures seamless migration for users.

Pros

  • Open-source and free to use.
  • Supports local inference.
  • Unlimited context window with RAG.
  • Zero data retention policy enhances privacy.
  • SOC2 Type II certification for enterprise security.

Cons

  • May require more technical expertise due to open-source nature.
  • No custom model provided.

Comparison Table

Feature Cursor Void
Architecture Type standalone standalone
Supported Os Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Developer Cursor Void (open-source)
Supported Llms GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-5 (High MAX), Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini, cursor-small, Supermaven Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, Grok 3, o4-mini, Qwen 3, DeepSeek, Llama, Gemma 3
Custom Model cursor-small
Context Window 1M tokens Unlimited (RAG)
Agentic Editing Yes, multi-file Yes, multi-file
Terminal Access Full Full
Privacy Mode Standard Privacy Policy Zero Data Retention (ZDR)
Certifications SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) SOC2 Type II (Enterprise)
About Price Free – $20/mo Free
Config File .cursorrules settings.json
Migration Seamless Seamless

Conclusion

Both Cursor and Void offer robust solutions for users seeking versatile, standalone tools. Cursor excels with its wide range of supported LLMs and predictive editing features, while Void stands out with its open-source nature, local inference, and strong privacy policies. Your choice will depend on specific needs such as privacy concerns or the necessity of local inference.