createaiagent.net

Comparing Development Tools: Cursor vs. WebStorm

Alex Hrymashevych Author by:
Alex Hrymashevych
Last update:
25 Jan 2026
Reading time:
~ 3 mins

Cursor: A Versatile Development Tool

Cursor is a standalone development tool designed to facilitate multi-platform coding with support for Windows, macOS, and Linux. Developed by Cursor, this tool integrates with various large language models, including GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-5 (High MAX), and more. It offers a unique custom model, cursor-small, allowing for tailored coding experiences. With a substantial context window of 1M tokens, Cursor enables extensive code analysis and editing. While it does not offer local inference, it provides agentic editing capabilities across multiple files, complete terminal access, and predictive edits. The tool follows a standard privacy policy and holds SOC2 Type II certification for enterprise users. It is available in a free tier, with premium options up to $20 per month, and supports seamless migration through its configuration file, .cursorrules.

Pros

  • Supports a wide range of LLMs including GPT-4 and GPT-5.
  • Offers a free tier for basic usage.
  • High context window of 1M tokens.
  • Seamless migration process.

Cons

  • No local inference capability.
  • Higher premium pricing up to $20/mo.

WebStorm: A Robust IDE for Developers

WebStorm, developed by JetBrains, is a standalone integrated development environment (IDE) tailored for professional developers using Windows, macOS, and Linux. It supports several advanced language models such as GPT-5, Gemini 2.0, Llama 4, and Mistral Enterprise. Although it does not offer a custom model, WebStorm provides local inference, which can be crucial for privacy-conscious developers. It also features agentic editing across multiple files and full terminal access, alongside predictive editing capabilities. With a 1M token context window, it allows for comprehensive code analysis and editing. WebStorm follows a standard privacy policy and is SOC2 Type II certified for enterprise security. While it does not offer a free tier, its pricing is competitive, ranging from $8 to $15 per month, although it requires setup for migration, managed through its .aicofig configuration file.

Pros

  • Local inference capability for enhanced privacy.
  • Competitive pricing from $8 to $15/mo.
  • Supports advanced LLMs like GPT-5 and Gemini 2.0.

Cons

  • No free tier available.
  • Migration requires additional setup.

Comparison Table

Feature Cursor WebStorm
Architecture Type standalone standalone
Supported Os Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Developer Cursor JetBrains
Supported Llms GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-5 (High MAX), Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini, cursor-small, Supermaven GPT-5, Gemini 2.0, Llama 4, Mistral Enterprise
Custom Model cursor-small
Context Window 1M tokens 1M tokens
Agentic Editing Yes, multi-file Yes, multi-file
Terminal Access Full Full
Privacy Mode Standard Privacy Policy Standard Privacy Policy
Certifications SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) SOC2 Type II (Enterprise)
About Price Free – $20/mo $8 – $15/mo
Config File .cursorrules .aicofig
Migration Seamless Requires setup

Conclusion

Both Cursor and WebStorm offer robust solutions for developers across multiple platforms. Cursor stands out with its support for a wide array of models and a free tier option, making it accessible for varied user needs. In contrast, WebStorm provides local inference, which is ideal for developers prioritizing data privacy, and offers competitive pricing. The choice between these tools should depend on specific needs related to cost, privacy, and migration preferences.