FlutterFlow
FlutterFlow is a cloud-based platform developed by FlutterFlow that allows users to build applications for multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and Web. It supports advanced language models such as GPT-5, Claude 4.5, and Gemini 3.0, catering to modern application needs with a significant context window of 200k tokens. Despite its robust capabilities, FlutterFlow does not offer local inference or predictive edits and limits agentic editing to single files only. The platform maintains a standard privacy policy and holds a SOC2 Type II certification, ensuring enterprise-level security. Users can start with a free tier or opt for a professional plan, with configuration managed through a .flutterflow file.
Pros
- ✓ Supports multiple operating systems including mobile and web.
- ✓ Integrates with advanced language models.
- ✓ Large context window of 200k tokens.
- ✓ SOC2 Type II certified for enterprise security.
- ✓ Offers a free tier.
Cons
- ✕ No local inference capabilities.
- ✕ Limited to single-file agentic editing.
- ✕ No predictive editing features.
Softr
Softr is a versatile cloud-based platform designed for the development of applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux. Unlike FlutterFlow, it does not support any specific language models, making it simpler but potentially less powerful for advanced AI-driven functionalities. Softr provides a context window of 128k tokens and shares FlutterFlow’s limitation in agentic editing to single files. It also adheres to a standard privacy policy and has SOC2 Type II certification, ensuring secure data handling. Softr is accessible with a free tier and scalable up to $165 per month, with configuration guided by a specialized file format.
Pros
- ✓ Supports major desktop operating systems.
- ✓ SOC2 Type II certified for data security.
- ✓ Flexible pricing from free to $165 per month.
Cons
- ✕ No support for specific language models.
- ✕ Limited context window compared to FlutterFlow.
- ✕ Lacks local inference and predictive editing.
Comparison Table
| Feature | FlutterFlow | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Type | cloud | cloud |
| Supported Os | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Web | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Developer | FlutterFlow | Softr |
| Supported Llms | GPT-5, Claude 4.5, Gemini 3.0 | – |
| Context Window | 200k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Agentic Editing | Single-file only | Single-file only |
| Terminal Access | No | No |
| Privacy Mode | Standard Privacy Policy | Standard Privacy Policy |
| Certifications | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) |
| About Price | Free/Pro | Free – $165/mo |
| Config File | .flutterflow | Имя файла для промптинга (напр. .cursorrules). |
| Migration | Requires setup | Requires setup |
Conclusion
Both FlutterFlow and Softr offer robust, cloud-based solutions with enterprise-level security. While FlutterFlow excels in supporting a wide range of operating systems and powerful language models, Softr provides a simpler, cost-effective option without advanced AI features. Each tool has its unique strengths and limitations, catering to different user needs and preferences.