Google Antigravity
Google Antigravity is a versatile standalone tool designed to support a wide range of operating systems including macOS, Windows, and Linux. Developed by Google, it is capable of utilizing various advanced language models such as Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Sonnet 4.5, among others. With a substantial context window of 1 million tokens, it allows for extensive text processing and analysis. The tool supports local inference, offering users the ability to perform computations locally without relying on external servers, ensuring enhanced privacy and control over data. Additionally, Google Antigravity features agentic editing across multiple files, full terminal access, and predictive edits to streamline editing processes. Users benefit from a free tier, with options for a Pro upgrade. However, initial setup is required, as indicated by its migration process.
Pros
- ✓ Supports a wide range of operating systems.
- ✓ Offers a high context window of 1 million tokens.
- ✓ Enables local inference for better privacy.
- ✓ Features multi-file agentic editing.
- ✓ Includes predictive editing capabilities.
Cons
- ✕ Requires setup for migration.
- ✕ Limited to Google's supported language models.
Trae
Trae, developed by ByteDance, is a standalone tool compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux. It supports language models like Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o, providing robust text processing capabilities with a context window of 200k tokens. Unlike Google Antigravity, Trae does not support local inference, which means computations are performed on external servers. However, it simplifies transitions with a seamless migration process. Trae also offers full terminal access and predictive editing, making it a strong contender for users requiring efficient text editing and processing tools. Like Antigravity, it provides a free tier with a Pro option for more advanced features.
Pros
- ✓ Compatible with major operating systems.
- ✓ Seamless migration process.
- ✓ Supports multi-file agentic editing.
- ✓ Full terminal access.
- ✓ Free tier available.
Cons
- ✕ Lower context window compared to Antigravity.
- ✕ No local inference support.
Comparison Table
| Feature | Google Antigravity | Trae |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Type | standalone | standalone |
| Supported Os | macOS, Windows, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Developer | ByteDance | |
| Supported Llms | Gemini 3 Pro (High/Low), Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking/Standard), GPT-OSS 120B, Ollama/Llama (local), Granite 4.0 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o |
| Context Window | 1M tokens | 200k tokens |
| Agentic Editing | Yes, multi-file | Yes, multi-file |
| Terminal Access | Full | Full |
| Privacy Mode | Standard Privacy Policy | Standard Privacy Policy |
| Certifications | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) |
| About Price | Free/Pro | Free/Pro |
| Config File | .antigravityrc | .traerc |
| Migration | Requires setup | Seamless |
Conclusion
Both Google Antigravity and Trae offer comprehensive features for text processing and editing, with unique strengths. Antigravity excels with its extensive context window and local inference capability, while Trae stands out with its seamless migration and robust language model support. Users should choose based on their specific needs, considering factors like privacy, setup, and editing capabilities.