Lapce
Lapce is a standalone code editor developed by the Lapce Project. It is designed to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. While it does not offer support for large language models (LLMs) or provide local inference capabilities, it is recognized for its simplicity and efficiency. This tool does not include agentic editing or terminal access, which may limit its functionality for advanced users. Despite these limitations, Lapce maintains a standard privacy policy and holds a SOC2 Type II certification for enterprises, ensuring a secure environment. Moreover, it offers a free tier, making it an accessible option for many developers. However, setting up Lapce requires a certain level of configuration, which may not be ideal for users seeking a plug-and-play solution.
Pros
- ✓ Cross-platform support for Windows, macOS, and Linux.
- ✓ Free to use.
- ✓ SOC2 Type II certification ensures security.
Cons
- ✕ No support for LLMs.
- ✕ Lacks local inference capabilities.
- ✕ No agentic editing or terminal access.
Melty
Melty is a robust standalone tool developed by Charlie Holtz and Jackson de Campos, offering extensive support for large language models such as GPT-5, Claude 4.5, Gemini 3.0, and o3. It is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, and supports local inference, allowing for more advanced functionalities. Melty stands out with its multi-file agentic editing and full terminal access, making it a powerful tool for developers who require comprehensive code editing capabilities. It boasts a context window of 200k tokens, significantly larger than many other tools, and follows a standard privacy policy with SOC2 Type II certification. Melty is available in both free and pro versions, providing flexibility depending on the user’s needs. However, like Lapce, Melty requires a setup process, making it less ideal for users seeking immediate usability.
Pros
- ✓ Supports multiple LLMs including GPT-5 and Claude 4.5.
- ✓ Offers local inference and multi-file agentic editing.
- ✓ Full terminal access for advanced functionalities.
Cons
- ✕ Requires setup which may be complex for some users.
- ✕ May have features locked behind a pro tier.
Comparison Table
| Feature | Lapce | Melty |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Type | standalone | standalone |
| Supported Os | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Developer | Lapce Project | Charlie Holtz, Jackson de Campos |
| Supported Llms | – | GPT-5, Claude 4.5, Gemini 3.0, o3 |
| Context Window | 32k tokens | 200k tokens |
| Agentic Editing | No | Yes, multi-file |
| Terminal Access | No | Full |
| Privacy Mode | Standard Privacy Policy | Standard Privacy Policy |
| Certifications | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) |
| About Price | Free | Free/Pro |
| Config File | Имя файла для промптинга (напр. .cursorrules). | .meltyrc |
| Migration | Requires setup | Requires setup |
Conclusion
Both Lapce and Melty offer unique features catering to different user needs. Lapce is more suited for users looking for a straightforward, free code editor without advanced features, while Melty provides extensive functionalities for those who require robust LLM support and more complex editing capabilities. The choice between the two will largely depend on the user’s specific requirements and technical expertise.