Trae: A Comprehensive Development Tool
Trae is a robust standalone application developed by ByteDance, designed for use across multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It supports leading language models such as Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o, and offers a generous context window of up to 200k tokens. While it does not support local inference, Trae provides full terminal access and predictive editing capabilities, making it a powerful tool for developers looking for advanced editing features. The privacy mode is governed by a Standard Privacy Policy, ensuring user data protection. Trae is available in both free and pro versions, making it accessible for a wide range of users. Its configuration is managed through the .traerc file, and it supports seamless migration for ease of transition.
Pros
- ✓ Supports Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o.
- ✓ Full terminal access for comprehensive control.
- ✓ Predictive edits enhance efficiency.
- ✓ Seamless migration process.
- ✓ Available on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Cons
- ✕ Does not support local inference.
- ✕ Standard Privacy Policy may not be sufficient for all users.
Void: An Open-Source Powerhouse
Void stands out as a versatile open-source tool that provides extensive capabilities across Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms. It supports a wide range of language models, including Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, and more, with a unique unlimited context window thanks to RAG technology. One of its key strengths is the ability to perform local inference, enhancing performance and efficiency. Void’s privacy mode features Zero Data Retention (ZDR), which prioritizes user privacy by ensuring no data is stored. With full terminal access and predictive editing, Void is ideal for developers seeking a flexible and secure environment. It is completely free and utilizes a settings.json configuration file for easy setup and seamless migration.
Pros
- ✓ Supports a wide range of language models.
- ✓ Unlimited context window with RAG.
- ✓ Local inference capability.
- ✓ Zero Data Retention for maximum privacy.
- ✓ Free and open-source.
Cons
- ✕ May require more technical knowledge for setup.
- ✕ Open-source nature might imply less structured support.
Comparison Table
| Feature | Trae | Void |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Type | standalone | standalone |
| Supported Os | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Developer | ByteDance | Void (open-source) |
| Supported Llms | Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o | Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, Grok 3, o4-mini, Qwen 3, DeepSeek, Llama, Gemma 3 |
| Context Window | 200k tokens | Unlimited (RAG) |
| Agentic Editing | Yes, multi-file | Yes, multi-file |
| Terminal Access | Full | Full |
| Privacy Mode | Standard Privacy Policy | Zero Data Retention (ZDR) |
| Certifications | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) | SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) |
| About Price | Free/Pro | Free |
| Config File | .traerc | settings.json |
| Migration | Seamless | Seamless |
Conclusion
Both Trae and Void offer robust features for developers, each catering to different needs. Trae excels in user-friendliness and structured support with its pro version, while Void provides extensive flexibility and privacy with its open-source nature. Choosing between them depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.