createaiagent.net

Comparing SEO Tools: Void vs Windsurf

Alex Hrymashevych Author by:
Alex Hrymashevych
Last update:
25 Jan 2026
Reading time:
~ 3 mins

Void: A Comprehensive Open-Source Solution

Void is a robust standalone tool developed by the open-source community, offering extensive support for various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. Designed to work with a wide array of large language models (LLMs) such as Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, and more, Void ensures versatility and adaptability. With its unique architecture, Void provides unlimited context windows through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), making it an ideal choice for projects requiring extensive context retention. It also enables local inference, giving users the power to process data locally, thereby enhancing privacy and reducing reliance on external servers. Furthermore, Void prides itself on zero data retention, ensuring user data remains private and secure. With features like agentic editing, full terminal access, and predictive edits, Void stands out as a powerful tool for developers and researchers alike.

Pros

  • Supports multiple operating systems
  • Works with a wide range of LLMs
  • Unlimited context window with RAG
  • Local inference capability
  • Zero data retention for enhanced privacy
  • Free to use

Cons

  • Requires configuration via settings.json
  • Limited to open-source support

Windsurf: Versatile and User-Friendly

Windsurf is a standalone tool known for its user-centric design and versatility. It supports Windows, macOS, and Linux, catering to a broad user base. Windsurf’s architecture allows for the use of its proprietary model SWE-1.5, as well as user-provided models, offering flexibility for custom applications. With a substantial context window of 200k tokens, Windsurf is well-suited for complex tasks requiring significant data input. Although it does not support local inference, Windsurf provides seamless integration and ease of use, making it an attractive option for those who prioritize user experience. It adheres to a standard privacy policy, balancing data handling with functionality. Windsurf offers a free tier with optional paid upgrades, allowing users to scale according to their needs.

Pros

  • Supports multiple operating systems
  • Allows user-provided models
  • Large context window
  • User-friendly interface
  • Free tier available

Cons

  • No local inference capability
  • Standard privacy policy may not suit all users

Comparison Table

Feature Void Windsurf
Architecture Type standalone standalone
Supported Os Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Developer Void (open-source) Windsurf
Supported Llms Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, Grok 3, o4-mini, Qwen 3, DeepSeek, Llama, Gemma 3 SWE-1.5, User-provided models
Custom Model SWE-1.5
Context Window Unlimited (RAG) 200k tokens
Agentic Editing Yes, multi-file Yes, multi-file
Terminal Access Full Full
Privacy Mode Zero Data Retention (ZDR) Standard Privacy Policy
Certifications SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) SOC2 Type II (Enterprise)
About Price Free Free – $30/mo
Config File settings.json .windsurfrc
Migration Seamless Seamless

Conclusion

Both Void and Windsurf offer distinct advantages tailored to different user needs. Void excels in privacy and local processing, making it ideal for users requiring extensive data security and control. In contrast, Windsurf offers a more flexible approach with its support for user-provided models and a user-friendly interface, appealing to those looking for ease of integration and scalability. Evaluating the specific requirements of your project will guide you in choosing the tool that best aligns with your objectives.