createaiagent.net

Comparing Void and Zed: Standalone Development Tools

Alex Hrymashevych Author by:
Alex Hrymashevych
Last update:
25 Jan 2026
Reading time:
~ 2 mins

Void: The Open-Source Powerhouse

Void is a robust and versatile standalone tool designed to cater to developers across platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux. As an open-source solution, Void offers users the flexibility of local inference, ensuring data privacy with its Zero Data Retention (ZDR) policy. The tool supports an impressive range of large language models such as Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, and GPT-4 among others. With its unlimited context window through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), Void allows seamless agentic editing across multiple files and full terminal access. Its predictive edits and SOC2 Type II certification make it a reliable choice for enterprise environments, all while being free of charge.

Pros

  • Open-source and free.
  • Supports a wide range of LLMs.
  • Unlimited context window with RAG.
  • Zero Data Retention (ZDR) for privacy.
  • Seamless migration.

Cons

  • No specific RAG type mentioned.
  • May require more technical setup.

Zed: A Comprehensive Development Companion

Zed is a powerful standalone tool compatible with macOS, Linux, and Windows, developed to streamline the development process with its support for various language models including Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5. Zed provides local inference capabilities and agentic editing across multiple files, coupled with full terminal access. Despite its standard privacy policy, Zed is SOC2 Type II certified, ensuring a level of trust and security for enterprise users. It offers a 200k token context window and comes with both free and pro versions, although migration may require setup adjustments. Zed’s predictive edits add further efficiency to the development workflow.

Pros

  • Supports multiple LLMs.
  • Full terminal access.
  • Predictive edits enhance workflow.
  • Available in free and pro versions.

Cons

  • Standard privacy policy with less emphasis on data retention.
  • Migration requires setup.

Comparison Table

Feature Void Zed
Architecture Type standalone standalone
Supported Os Windows, macOS, Linux macOS, Linux, Windows
Developer Void (open-source) Zed
Supported Llms Gemini 2.5, Claude 3.7, GPT-4, Grok 3, o4-mini, Qwen 3, DeepSeek, Llama, Gemma 3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5, Ollama (local), Zeta (open-source)
Context Window Unlimited (RAG) 200k tokens
Agentic Editing Yes, multi-file Yes, multi-file
Terminal Access Full Full
Privacy Mode Zero Data Retention (ZDR) Standard Privacy Policy
Certifications SOC2 Type II (Enterprise) SOC2 Type II (Enterprise)
About Price Free Free/Pro
Config File settings.json .zedrc
Migration Seamless Requires setup

Conclusion

Both Void and Zed offer robust solutions for developers seeking powerful standalone tools. While Void stands out with its open-source nature and unlimited context window, Zed provides a balanced option with its support for multiple models and versatile pricing. The choice between them will depend on specific needs such as privacy requirements and the ease of migration.